CLEAN : Families of those killed in MH17 plane shoot-down await 'justice' in Netherlands verdict

The video discusses the complexities of military laws, the MH17 case, and the role of justice. It reflects on past press conferences, the prosecution's arguments, and the importance of an independent court verdict. The concept of closure for the next of kin of MH17 victims is explored, emphasizing that true closure may never be achieved. The video also highlights the value of presenting evidence publicly and the use of user-generated and OSINT evidence in modern trials, showcasing the evolving nature of legal proceedings.

What is one of the main challenges faced by the prosecution in the MH17 trial?

• Lack of evidence

• Involvement of multiple countries

• Russia's heavy involvement

• Uncooperative witnesses

Why is the concept of closure considered theoretical for the next of kin?

• Because the evidence is insufficient

• Because the suspects may never serve time

• Because the court is biased

• Because the trial is ongoing

What is the significance of the MH17 trial despite its imperfections?

• It provides a sense of justice

• It guarantees the suspects' conviction

• It resolves all legal issues

• It ensures international cooperation

What type of evidence is prominently used in the MH17 trial?

• Eyewitness accounts

• User-generated and OSINT evidence

• Confessions from suspects

• Forensic evidence

How has the use of modern evidence impacted legal proceedings?

• It has helped build new legal procedures

• It has complicated legal standards

• It has made trials longer

• It has reduced the number of trials