Pakistan Foreign Minister Zardari Defends Modi Taunt

The transcript discusses a controversial remark made about Mr. Modi, referred to as the 'butcher of Gujarat,' which led to significant uproar in India and internationally. The speaker clarifies that the term was historically used by Muslims in India post-Gujarat riots and was not an invention of their own. The situation escalated with a bounty announced on the speaker's head and misinterpretations of a nuclear threat. The speaker emphasizes the importance of addressing historical facts without resorting to extreme measures or threats.

What was the speaker's main point regarding their remarks about Mr. Modi?

• They were inventing a new term.

• They were quoting a historical term used by others.

• They were making a political statement.

• They were expressing a personal opinion.

What was the reaction to the speaker's remarks in India?

• The remarks were ignored.

• There were protests and a bounty was announced.

• There was no reaction.

• There was widespread support.

How did the speaker view the announcement of a bounty on their head?

• As a common practice.

• As a diplomatic gesture.

• As an extreme and troubling measure.

• As a justified response.

What did the speaker clarify about the nuclear war threat?

• Nuclear war is an appropriate reaction.

• No nuclear war threat was made.

• A minister threatened nuclear war.

• A nuclear war was officially declared.

What does the speaker suggest about the response to historical facts?

• It should be exaggerated.

• It should be met with responsible dialogue.

• It should be ignored.

• It should involve threats of violence.