Developer China Evergrande Criticized by Exchanges Over Earnings Delay

Developer China Evergrande Criticized by Exchanges Over Earnings Delay

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses Evergrande's recent changes in auditors for its Hong Kong and onshore units, highlighting potential issues in its financial books, such as off-balance sheet debts and deposit pledges. These issues raise concerns about transparency and corporate governance. The video also addresses the implications for Evergrande's debt restructuring, including the risk of delisting from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, which could affect the feasibility of a debt-to-equity swap and lead to creditor pushback.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What significant change did Evergrande make in January regarding its financial auditing?

It launched a new product line.

It merged with another company.

It changed its auditor for its Hong Kong listed units.

It hired a new CEO.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What are some of the financial concerns mentioned in the first section?

Increased marketing expenses

Rising production costs

Off-balance sheet debts

High employee turnover

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is a potential consequence for Evergrande if it is delisted from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange?

Its stock price would increase.

It would gain more investors.

Its shares would become unlisted and not tradeable.

It would receive a government bailout.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why might a debt-to-equity swap be considered pointless if Evergrande is delisted?

Because its shares would no longer be tradeable.

Because it would have too many shareholders.

Because it would have no debts left.

Because the company would be more profitable.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one concern of creditors regarding Evergrande's debt restructuring proposal?

The proposal is too simple.

The proposal lacks transparency.

The proposal is too expensive.

The proposal is too short.