Too Much Transparency?

The video discusses the complex role of lying in politics, suggesting that it isn't always negative and that excessive transparency can be harmful. It challenges the view that politics is solely about self-interest and corruption, highlighting that good can emerge even when moral ideals are suspended. The discussion includes references to literature that acknowledges the positive functions of lying and explores the concept of dreaming in politics. The Snowden revelations are used as an example of the potential dysfunction of excessive truth-telling, questioning whether it always leads to better politics.

What is one potential downside of too much transparency in politics?

• It could put people's lives at risk.

• It can lead to increased public trust.

• It always improves political outcomes.

• It may result in better decision-making.

According to the transcript, what is a common misconception about politics?

• Politics never involves any form of lying.

• Politics is always transparent and honest.

• Politics is solely about public service.

• Politics is only about self-interest and corruption.

What does the speaker suggest about the role of lying in achieving positive outcomes?

• Lying is only beneficial in personal relationships.

• Lying is always detrimental to political processes.

• Lying can sometimes help achieve good results.

• Lying never leads to positive outcomes.

What example is used to illustrate the potential dysfunction of excessive truth-telling?

• The Snowden revelations

• The French Revolution

• The Watergate scandal

• The Cuban Missile Crisis

What question does the speaker raise about the impact of full disclosure?

• Does it increase public engagement?

• Does it always lead to better politics?

• Does it enhance media coverage?

• Does it reduce political corruption?