Hundreds protest in London against Rosebank oilfield approval

The transcript discusses the need for political action against the Rosebank oil field, urging Labor to revoke its license. It highlights the environmental impact of Rosebank, comparing it to the Cambo oil field and emphasizing the power of public advocacy. The government's Climate Change Committee opposes oil production, and Rosebank's emissions are likened to those of 56 coal-fired power stations. The transcript calls for public action to prevent the government's approval of this 'climate bomb.'

What action is being urged upon the Labor party regarding the Rosebank oil field?

• To revoke the license and oppose the project

• To conduct further research on the project

• To support the project for economic growth

• To remain neutral and let the market decide

What was the outcome of the public's efforts against the Cambo oil field in 2021?

• The project was delayed

• The project was halted

• The project was expanded

• The project was relocated

What does the government's Committee on Climate Change recommend regarding oil production?

• It should be increased to meet energy demands

• It should be reduced to combat climate change

• It should be maintained at current levels

• It should be outsourced to other countries

How do the emissions from the Rosebank oil field compare to coal-fired power stations?

• Equivalent to 56 coal-fired power stations

• Equivalent to 28 coal-fired power stations

• Equivalent to 100 coal-fired power stations

• Equivalent to 10 coal-fired power stations

What is the environmental impact of the Rosebank oil field compared to low-income countries?

• Same emissions as 10 low-income countries

• Same emissions as 28 low-income countries

• Same emissions as 100 low-income countries

• Same emissions as 56 low-income countries