Michelle Donelan apologises for making Hamas damages claim on social media

The speaker addresses a recent issue involving a tweet by an EDI board member under UKRI, which led to concerns about the appointment process. After working with officials and legal teams, a letter was sent to UKRI for investigation. The tweet was later clarified, and the speaker withdrew concerns, settling the case for £15,000 to avoid legal costs. The speaker reflects on the situation, acknowledging a lack of confidentiality and apologizes for any distraction caused.

What was the initial concern raised by the speaker regarding the EDI board under UKRI?

• A tweet by a representative

• A policy change

• A financial discrepancy

• A missing report

What action did the speaker take in response to the concerning tweet?

• Resigned from the position

• Held a press conference

• Drafted a letter to UKRI's CEO

• Requested a public apology

How was the issue with the tweet eventually resolved?

• The representative was removed from the board

• Concerns were withdrawn and a settlement was paid

• A public apology was issued

• The tweet was deleted

What amount was paid to settle the case and avoid further legal costs?

• £25,000

• £20,000

• £10,000

• £15,000

What did the speaker reflect on regarding the handling of the situation?

• The necessity of stricter regulations

• The role of social media in governance

• The importance of confidentiality in certain cases

• The need for more public statements