What science says about fluoride in water

What science says about fluoride in water

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies, Health Sciences, Biology

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The video discusses Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s views on fluoride in drinking water and his plans to address it if he joins the Trump administration. Kennedy considers fluoride harmful, linking it to various health issues, and plans to advise water districts on legal liabilities. Despite scientific studies showing potential risks, public health organizations like the CDC and ADA support fluoride for its dental benefits. Kennedy is also a vaccine skeptic, advocating for individual choice despite expert advice on community protection.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is one of the main reasons Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to remove fluoride from drinking water?

It improves bone density.

It enhances water taste.

It is considered industrial waste.

It causes tooth decay.

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

According to a recent government study, what is the effect of fluoride levels twice the recommended amount in drinking water?

Increased risk of arthritis in adults

Lower IQ in children

Higher cancer rates in adults

Improved dental health in children

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What does the CDC say about fluoride in drinking water?

It has no impact on public health.

It is a major cause of tooth decay.

It is one of the top public health achievements of the 20th century.

It should be removed from all water supplies.

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s position on vaccines?

He wants to ban all vaccines.

He supports mandatory vaccination for all.

He wants to give people more power to decline vaccines.

He believes vaccines are completely ineffective.

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why do health policy experts advocate for community-wide vaccination?

It is more cost-effective.

It ensures individual freedom.

It works best when entire communities are protected.

It reduces the need for healthcare professionals.