Trump vs. Clinton: Who Do the Markets Want?

The transcript discusses the potential impact of the 2016 U.S. presidential election on financial markets. It highlights market predictions favoring Hillary Clinton due to her perceived stability compared to Donald Trump, whose unpredictability is seen as a risk. The discussion also touches on Trump's financial history and its implications for his presidency. Overall, the markets prefer stability and predictability, which they associate more with Clinton.

What probability did market indicators suggest for Hillary Clinton's victory in the 2016 election?

• 50%

• 60%

• 80%

• 90%

What was Donald Trump's approach to financing in the private sector?

• Using personal savings

• Raising venture capital

• Borrowing money and issuing debt

• Issuing stocks

Why is Donald Trump considered a 'wild card' in terms of market impact?

• His consistent policies

• His predictable nature

• His high level of uncertainty

• His strong ties with Wall Street

How is Hillary Clinton perceived in terms of market policies?

• As a radical leftist

• As a market-friendly moderate

• As an unpredictable leader

• As a Wall Street critic

What is the general market sentiment towards a Clinton presidency?

• Concern over unknown policies

• Anticipation of high volatility

• Expectation of status quo

• Fear of radical changes