Musk Proposes $2.9B 'No Brainer' Tesla-SolarCity Deal

Musk Proposes $2.9B 'No Brainer' Tesla-SolarCity Deal

Assessment

Interactive Video

Business, Biology, Architecture, Performing Arts

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses a $2.9 billion deal involving Tesla and SolarCity, highlighting stock movements and Elon Musk's significant stake in both companies. While Musk views the deal as beneficial, many investors are concerned it distracts Tesla from its primary goal of producing Model 3 cars. The deal could increase Tesla's debt, complicating its financial situation. Musk envisions an integrated solution for customers, combining Tesla cars with SolarCity panels. Despite his vision, Musk recuses himself from board votes due to his large stakes in both companies.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was the initial market reaction to the Tesla and SolarCity deal announcement?

Tesla shares rose while SolarCity shares fell

Both Tesla and SolarCity shares rose

Tesla shares fell while SolarCity shares rose

Both Tesla and SolarCity shares fell

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why are some Tesla shareholders concerned about the acquisition of SolarCity?

It might increase Tesla's debt

It could distract from Model 3 production

It may lead to a decrease in Tesla's stock price

It could result in a loss of market share

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What is Elon Musk's vision for integrating Tesla and SolarCity?

To create a new line of luxury cars

To reduce production costs

To offer a complete eco-friendly energy solution

To expand into international markets

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What financial challenge does Tesla face with the SolarCity acquisition?

A drop in sales

A loss of key investors

An increase in debt

A decrease in stock value

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

Why did Elon Musk recuse himself from voting on the deal?

He was not available for the vote

He wanted to avoid a conflict of interest

He had a controlling stake in both companies

He disagreed with the board's decision