CLEAN: Kenyans give their verdict to ICC decision

The transcript discusses a perceived injustice in a legal case, highlighting political interference and public dissatisfaction with the decision to release some suspects. It questions the source of information used in the decision-making process and expresses a desire for fairness. The legal framework, including the Rome Statute, is mentioned, and the decisions were upheld on appeal.

What does the speaker believe about the justice served?

• It was partially served due to political interference.

• It was not served at all.

• It was served without any political influence.

• It was fully served.

Why were most people unhappy with the decision to release one person from each debate?

• They believed it was a fair decision.

• They wanted more people to be released.

• They were not informed about the decision.

• They thought it was based on political reasons.

What did the speaker expect regarding the trial of the four suspects?

• Only one suspect to be tried.

• All suspects to be released without trial.

• None of the suspects to be tried.

• All suspects to be tried or released.

What does the speaker mention about the source of information?

• The source was irrelevant to the case.

• The source was unknown and lacked transparency.

• The source was publicly disclosed.

• The source was reliable and transparent.

Which legal document is referenced by the speaker?

• The Magna Carta

• The United Nations Charter

• The Rome Statute

• The Geneva Convention