Judge Blocks HHS' 'Conscience Provisions' For Health Care Providers

The transcript discusses a rule by the Trump Administration allowing medical workers to refuse services based on moral or religious beliefs. This rule faced legal challenges from multiple states and entities, arguing it was unconstitutional. The rule required compliance for federal funding. However, Judge Paul Engelmayer ruled the provisions too coercive. The ACLU hailed the decision as a victory against discrimination, emphasizing that religious beliefs should not justify denying essential care. The rule was set to take effect on November 22nd.

What are the implications of religious beliefs in the context of providing essential care according to the statement from the ACLU?

What was the intended effect date of the new rule that was challenged?