The 'Friends' Seeking to Influence U.S. Courts

The video discusses a lawsuit involving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, highlighting the role of 'friends of the court' who submit briefs to influence court decisions. These entities, not directly involved in the case, can sway outcomes, raising concerns about transparency and potential lobbying. The prevalence of such practices in the US Supreme Court and federal appeals courts is surprising to many experts. The video also touches on the ethical implications and the ongoing nature of these legal battles.

What is a 'friend of the court' in legal terms?

• A judge who offers advice to the litigants

• An individual who provides financial support to the court

• Someone who submits a brief to the court without being a party

• A party directly involved in the case

How many cases involving 'friends of the court' were mentioned in the Fannie Mae shareholder case?

• 10 cases

• 17 cases

• 5 cases

• 20 cases

What is the potential impact of 'friends of the court' on legal proceedings?

• They can sway the court's decision through lobbying

• They have no impact on the court's decision

• They are only allowed to observe the proceedings

• They provide financial support to the litigants

What was the reaction of legal experts to the influence of 'friends of the court'?

• They supported it

• They ignored it

• They were surprised by it

• They were well aware of it

Who is Bruce Berkowitz in the context of the Fannie Mae case?

• A judge presiding over the case

• An investor with significant stakes in Fannie Mae

• A lawyer representing the government

• A journalist covering the case