CNN's Motion Granted: Jim Acosta's White House Press Pass Temporarily Returned | THR News

CNN filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to restore Jim Acosta's press pass, which was revoked by the White House. Judge Kelly ruled that Acosta was not given due process and temporarily restored his pass, indicating CNN is likely to win the case. Arguments were presented by both CNN and the White House, focusing on First and Fifth Amendment rights. The ruling was seen as a victory for press freedom, with positive reactions from CNN and Acosta.

What was the primary reason CNN filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration?

• To challenge a new press policy

• To demand a public apology from the White House

• To seek a permanent ban on press pass revocations

• To temporarily return Jim Acosta's suspended press pass

What did Judge Kelly state about the due process in Acosta's case?

• The due process was delayed

• Acosta was given ample due process

• Acosta was not afforded due process

• Due process was irrelevant to the case

What was the White House's argument regarding the motion filed by CNN?

• The motion was filed too late

• The motion was irrelevant to the case

• CNN's team met the necessary burden

• CNN's team did not meet the high burden necessary

What rights did CNN argue were violated by the White House's decision?

• First and Fifth Amendment rights

• Second and Fourth Amendment rights

• Sixth and Seventh Amendment rights

• Eighth and Ninth Amendment rights

How did Boutros Junior react to the ruling?

• He remained neutral about the ruling

• He decided to appeal the decision

• He expressed satisfaction with the ruling

• He was disappointed with the outcome