The speaker discusses the historical separation between particle physics and astronomy, and their personal journey in choosing particle physics over astronomy due to its descriptive nature. They recount their time at the University of Texas, focusing on theoretical work rather than experimental. The speaker's interest in neutrinos led to an exploration of cosmology, which was a new field for both them and their advisor. This collaborative learning experience was valuable, as they learned together, making mistakes and progressing in understanding cosmology and its relation to particle physics.

Why did the speaker choose not to pursue astronomy in college?

• They were more interested in botany.

• They preferred experimental work.

• They found astronomy too descriptive and not intellectually stimulating.

• They did not have access to astronomy courses.

What aspect of particle physics did the speaker find more appealing than experimental work?

• The hands-on laboratory work.

• The chance to work with famous scientists.

• The mathematical and theoretical concepts.

• The opportunity to travel for experiments.

During their graduate studies, what did the speaker realize about their skills?

• They were better suited for experimental work.

• They enjoyed using their hands in labs.

• They preferred theoretical work and mathematics.

• They wanted to switch to astronomy.

What sparked the speaker's interest in cosmology and astronomy?

• A famous astronomer's lecture.

• Their childhood fascination with stars.

• A suggestion from their advisor about neutrinos.

• A mandatory course in their curriculum.

How did the speaker and their advisor approach learning cosmology?

• They relied on textbooks exclusively.

• They attended a series of workshops.

• They learned together, making mistakes along the way.

• The advisor taught the speaker everything.