Tanaiste rejects accusations Catherine Martin has been a ‘hands-off’ media minister during RTE crisis

The transcript discusses Catherine Martin's involvement, the minister's comprehensive response in Roctus, and the breakdown of the minister's relationship due to a lack of confidence in responses. It expresses regret over the situation and acknowledges contributions. The minister's expectations for clear answers and accountability in decision-making are emphasized.

What was the general perception of Catherine Martin's involvement in the issue?

• She was unaware of the issue.

• She was partially involved.

• She was completely hands off.

• She was very involved.

How did the minister respond to questions in the Roctus?

• By delegating the questions to others.

• By avoiding the questions.

• With brief and vague answers.

• Very comprehensively and transparently.

What was a key reason for the breakdown in the relationship?

• A lack of public support for the minister.

• The minister's lack of confidence in the responses received.

• A disagreement over financial matters.

• A personal conflict between the minister and the chair.

What did the minister expect when significant decisions were made?

• To be informed fully and know who was responsible.

• To be consulted only if necessary.

• To be left out of the decision-making process.

• To receive a summary after decisions were made.

What was the minister's stance on communication and accountability?

• She was indifferent to it.

• She thought it was the responsibility of others.

• She was adamant about receiving clear communication and accountability.

• She believed it was not important.