Maine's secretary of state on Trump and the Super Tuesday primary

Maine's secretary of state on Trump and the Super Tuesday primary

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

Secretary Bellows discusses the Supreme Court's decision that states cannot disqualify federal candidates based on the 14th Amendment's Section 3. She emphasizes her duty to uphold the Constitution, regardless of personal views. The conversation touches on past statements about the Insurrection Clause, the impact of public opinion on the Court's decision, and the importance of a secure election. Bellows also notes a decrease in threats against her and her family, expressing hope for high voter turnout.

Read more

5 questions

Show all answers

1.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What was Secretary Bellows' primary obligation as Meade's chief elections official?

To support her personal views

To uphold the Constitution

To disqualify federal candidates

To follow public opinion

2.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What did the Supreme Court rule regarding the authority of states under Section Three of the 14th Amendment?

It only applies to state elections

States can apply it to federal candidates

States have no authority to apply it to federal candidates

It is up to each state's discretion

3.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

How did Secretary Bellows describe the Supreme Court's guidance on the election process?

Confusing and unclear

Clear and straightforward

Open to interpretation

Irrelevant to state elections

4.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What message does the Supreme Court's decision send to future presidential candidates?

State officials will not disqualify them based on Section Three

They can be disqualified by state officials

They are exempt from all constitutional clauses

They must adhere to state-specific rules

5.

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION

30 sec • 1 pt

What change did Secretary Bellows report regarding threats against her and her family?

Complete cessation of threats

An increase in threats

A decrease in threats

No change in the situation