Nato General Secretary: Disagreements among Nato member states is nothing new

The video discusses NATO's commitment to arms control and defense, addressing Russia's missile deployment and the rise of China. It highlights NATO's adaptability and unity despite historical disagreements, emphasizing the alliance's focus on substance over rhetoric. The video also outlines plans to strengthen NATO's political dimension and future meetings.

What is NATO's commitment regarding arms control and dialogue with Russia?

How does NATO plan to address the rise of China in relation to arms control?

In what ways has NATO adapted to a changing security environment?

What has been the historical significance of disagreements within NATO?

What does the speaker imply about the relationship between rhetoric and substance in NATO?