Goodell: Ray Rice Video Not Consistent With His Story

The transcript discusses a sequence of events involving an initial meeting and disciplinary action, which was later deemed insufficient. New information emerged, prompting further action. The release of a second tape publicly contradicted earlier statements, leading to additional measures.

What was acknowledged about the initial disciplinary action?

• It was perfectly adequate.

• It was unnecessary.

• It was too harsh.

• It was not sufficient.

What prompted the decision to take additional action?

• A legal requirement.

• A change in leadership.

• A public outcry.

• New information that contradicted previous accounts.

What was the significance of the second tape?

• It confirmed the initial story.

• It was irrelevant to the case.

• It provided evidence that was inconsistent with previous statements.

• It was a duplicate of the first tape.

How long after the initial meeting did the new information become public?

• About 2 days.

• About 3 weeks.

• About 10 days.

• About 1 month.

What was the initial description of the event inconsistent with?

• The initial meeting.

• The second tape.

• The public's opinion.

• The legal advice.