Willam Hague grab on Libya Ceasefire

The transcript discusses the non-compliance of the Gadhafi regime with UN Security Council resolutions 1970 and 1973, highlighting the opposition's stance in Libya, including the Interim National Council. It emphasizes that anything less than full compliance is a betrayal of the Libyan people and benefits the regime, which has declared meaningless ceasefires while continuing its military campaign. The focus is on judging the regime by its actions rather than its words.

What are the UN Security Council resolutions mentioned in the video?

• Resolutions 1970 and 1973

• Resolutions 1980 and 1983

• Resolutions 2000 and 2003

• Resolutions 1990 and 1993

What is the stance of the Libyan opposition regarding the UN resolutions?

• They demand full compliance with the resolutions.

• They fully support the regime's actions.

• They find the resolutions unacceptable.

• They are indifferent to the resolutions.

What would be the consequence of not fully adhering to the UN resolutions?

• It would strengthen the opposition.

• It would be a betrayal to the Libyan people.

• It would lead to immediate peace.

• It would have no impact.

How has the Gadhafi regime responded to the conflict according to the video?

• By fully complying with the UN resolutions.

• By announcing meaningless ceasefires.

• By skipping military campaigns.

• By implementing effective ceasefires.

What is the suggested way to judge the Gadhafi regime?

• By their promises.

• By their actions.

• By their speeches.

• By their alliances.