CLEAN : Pistorius risks 15 years in jail after murder conviction

The transcript discusses a legal case involving a judge's decision on a trial. It questions whether the verdict of culpable homicide was appropriate based on the evidence and witness testimonies. There is a debate on whether historians should have been convicted, and the case is referred back to the High Court for further judgment and sentencing.

What was the main focus of the judge's decision regarding Gates?

• The evidence and testimonies presented

• The judge's personal opinion

• The historical context

• The public's reaction

What is the role of evidence and testimonies in a trial?

• To influence the judge's attire

• To entertain the jury

• To delay the trial

• To support the judge's decision

What was the disagreement with the current judgment about?

• The location of the trial

• The length of the trial

• The lack of a conviction against historians

• The judge's attire

Why does the matter need to be referred back to the trial court?

• To involve more witnesses

• To gather more evidence

• To change the judge

• To find an appropriate sentence against the historian

What is the expected outcome after referring the matter back to the trial court?

• A change in the judge's attire

• A new location for the trial

• An appropriate sentence against the historian

• A shorter trial duration