CLEAN: UK top court rules Assange can be extradite

The video discusses how certain legal cases can bring to light important issues that were previously unnoticed. It highlights the significance of the WikiLeaks and Julian Assange case for journalists, emphasizing that if such legal actions can happen to Assange, they can happen to any journalist. The video also touches on the influence of the state in legal outcomes, with a portion of cases ending in favor of the state.

What is a common occurrence in legal cases according to the video?

• All cases are resolved without any issues.

• Cases sometimes raise unforeseen but important issues.

• Cases always have predictable outcomes.

• Cases never raise new issues.

What is the significance of unforeseen issues in legal cases?

• They need to be determined and resolved.

• They are resolved without any impact.

• They are irrelevant to the case.

• They are always ignored.

Why should journalists be concerned about the WikiLeaks and Assange case?

• It is unrelated to press freedom.

• It has no impact on journalism.

• It only affects Julian Assange.

• It could set a precedent affecting all journalists.

What is the main concern for journalists regarding the Assange case?

• It might result in stricter press regulations.

• It could lead to more job opportunities.

• It could happen to any journalist.

• It will only affect digital media.

What percentage of cases end in favor of the state, as mentioned in the video?

• 50%

• 70%

• 90%

• 30%