CLEAN : Trump's travel ban unjust and discriminatory: US rights group

The transcript discusses the Supreme Court's decision to hear a case related to a new legal definition, which some view as problematic. While some see this as a victory against President Trump's executive order, the speaker disagrees, arguing that the decision contradicts previous court rulings that deemed the order an unjust and discriminatory Muslim ban.

What is the Supreme Court planning to do with the case?

• Dismiss it without hearing

• Postpone the hearing indefinitely

• Hear the case and introduce a new legal definition

• Refer it to a lower court

How do some people perceive the Supreme Court's decision?

• As irrelevant to the executive order

• As a support for the executive order

• As a defeat for President Trump's executive order

• As a delay tactic

What is the stance of the speaker regarding the Supreme Court's decision?

• They agree with the public perception

• They believe it contradicts previous court rulings

• They think it supports the executive order

• They are indifferent to the decision

What have previous courts decided about the executive order?

• It is a minor legal issue

• It is irrelevant to the case

• It is unjust and discriminatory

• It is just and necessary

What is the nature of the executive order being discussed?

• An environmental regulation

• A Muslim ban

• A tax policy

• A healthcare reform