CLEAN : Zambia president blames rivals for state of emergency

The speaker discusses the potential outcomes of an election and the resulting consequences. They emphasize their commitment to fulfilling their responsibilities within the legal framework, clarifying that their actions are not excessive but are in accordance with the law.

What does the speaker suggest about the potential outcome of the election?

• It will lead to a peaceful transition.

• It will bring about significant changes.

• It will have no impact.

• It will be a repeat of past events.

How does the speaker view their role in the face of criticism?

• They are indifferent to the criticism.

• They feel overwhelmed and want to quit.

• They believe they are doing what is necessary.

• They think they are being too lenient.

What justification does the speaker provide for their perceived excessiveness?

• It is a personal preference.

• It is a strategy to gain popularity.

• It is a way to avoid legal issues.

• It is in the interest of the people.

What is the speaker's stance on the legality of their actions?

• They believe the law is too restrictive.

• They claim all actions are within legal limits.

• They are unsure about the legality of their actions.

• They admit to occasionally breaking the law.

What does the speaker want the audience to understand about their actions?

• That they are arbitrary and without reason.

• That they are excessive and beyond control.

• That they are within the legal framework.

• That they are meant to provoke a reaction.