Don McGahn Appeals Ruling That He Must Obey Congress' Subpoena

A judge ordered compliance with a congressional subpoena for testimony in an impeachment inquiry. The individual sought to delay testimony during the appeal process, but a federal judge ruled against the use of executive privilege to avoid testifying. The judge emphasized the importance of separating powers to prevent tyranny. The Justice Department noted that no appeals court has decided if the executive branch can stop White House officials from testifying, but believes there is a significant chance of winning the appeal.

What was the initial ruling regarding the congressional subpoena?

• The judge ruled against the subpoena.

• The judge ordered compliance with the subpoena.

• The judge postponed the subpoena indefinitely.

• The judge declared the subpoena unconstitutional.

What did the federal judge decide about McGahn's testimony?

• McGahn was allowed to testify only in private.

• McGahn's testimony was deemed unnecessary.

• McGahn was granted immunity from testifying.

• McGahn must testify despite claims of executive privilege.

What is a core tenet of the nation's founding according to the judge?

• The executive branch holds supreme power.

• The powers of a monarch must be split between government branches.

• The judicial branch can override all others.

• The legislative branch is the most powerful.

What has the Justice Department stated about the appeals court's stance?

• The appeals court has ruled in favor of the executive branch.

• The appeals court has not determined the executive branch's power in this context.

• The appeals court has sided with Congress.

• The appeals court has refused to hear the case.

What is McGahn's chance of winning the appeal according to the Justice Department?

• McGahn's chances are uncertain.

• McGahn has a significant chance of winning.

• McGahn is guaranteed to win.

• McGahn has no chance of winning.