Appeals Court To Reconsider Whether Don McGhan Can Decline Subpoena

The transcript discusses the legal battle involving former White House Counsel Don McGahn, who declined a congressional subpoena. The House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit to compel his compliance, challenging the president's claim of absolute immunity. The case highlights the potential extremes lawmakers might resort to for enforcement, including arrests. Oral arguments are set for April 28th, and the case also impacts the legal attempt to halt border wall funding.

What was the House Judiciary Committee's action in response to Don McGahn's refusal to appear?

• They requested a meeting with the president.

• They filed a lawsuit in federal court.

• They issued a public statement.

• They held a press conference.

What does the complaint say about the president's claim of absolute immunity for McGahn?

• It is a common defense used in similar cases.

• It has no legal basis and is unprecedented.

• It is well-supported by previous court rulings.

• It was accepted by the federal court.

What extreme measure might lawmakers consider if subpoenas are not enforced?

• Requesting intervention from the Supreme Court.

• Holding additional hearings.

• Seeking arrests of officials who refuse to appear.

• Issuing fines to non-compliant officials.

When are the oral arguments for the McGahn case scheduled to start?

• April 28th

• May 15th

• April 15th

• May 1st

What additional legal issue is the appeals court allowed to weigh in on?

• The House's attempt to stop border wall funding.

• The appointment of Supreme Court justices.

• The legality of the president's travel ban.

• The impeachment process of the president.