Lawyers: Special Counsel Urges Reinstating Ousted Vaccine Expert

Federal investigators suggest that Dr. Bright was wrongfully removed from his position at the Department of Health and Human Services. The Office of Special Counsel found reasonable grounds that his transfer to the National Institute of Health violated the Whistleblower Protection Act. This action followed Bright's criticism of a malaria drug promoted by President Trump as a COVID-19 cure. Officials recommended Bright's reinstatement for 45 days during the ongoing investigation. President Trump described Bright as a disgruntled employee. Bright is set to testify before a House committee.

What was the initial suggestion by federal investigators regarding Bright's removal?

• It was a wrongful removal.

• It was justified due to performance issues.

• It was due to budget cuts.

• It was a routine departmental change.

Which act did the Office of Special Counsel determine was violated in Bright's transfer?

• The Whistleblower Protection Act

• The Civil Rights Act

• The Federal Employees Act

• The Freedom of Information Act

What was the reason behind Bright's transfer according to his lawyers?

• He was promoted to a higher role.

• He was punished for speaking out.

• He was moved for better opportunities.

• He requested a new position.

What was President Trump's reaction to Bright's situation?

• He praised Bright's work.

• He remained neutral and did not comment.

• He called Bright a disgruntled employee.

• He expressed support for Bright.

What is the next step for Bright as mentioned in the transcript?

• He will receive a public apology.

• He will testify in front of a House committee.

• He will retire from public service.

• He will be reinstated permanently.