Starbucks Reverses Decision To Ban Black Lives Matter Paraphernalia

The transcript discusses a company's initial ban on Black Lives Matter attire due to a policy against political or religious clothing. This led to public criticism and calls for boycotts, especially since the company supported LGBTQ Pride Month. In response, the company reversed its decision and began distributing Black Lives Matter t-shirts to employees, emphasizing a collective effort for change.

What was the reason given by the company for banning political or religious attire?

• To support Black Lives Matter

• To maintain a safe and welcoming environment

• To promote LGBTQ Pride Month

• To encourage employee individuality

What was the public's reaction to the enforcement of the attire policy?

• They supported the policy

• They praised the company

• They were indifferent

• They called for boycotts

What contradiction did critics point out regarding the company's policies?

• The company had no clear policy

• The company supported LGBTQ Pride Month but banned Black Lives Matter attire

• The company banned all types of attire

• The company only supported political movements

What action did Starbucks take in response to the backlash?

• They ignored the backlash

• They reinforced the policy

• They reversed the decision and sent Black Lives Matter t-shirts to employees

• They banned all types of attire

What message did Starbucks convey in their letter to company partners?

• Black Lives Matter is not important

• Change can be achieved by working together

• Only some employees will receive t-shirts

• The policy will remain unchanged