Keir Starmer: Boris Johnson should have sacked Matt Hancock

The transcript discusses the resignation of Matt Hancock and the ongoing issues it raises. It highlights the need for answers from the new health secretary and the Prime Minister regarding various concerns. The critique extends to Boris Johnson's leadership, emphasizing his slow response and lack of decisive action. The discussion also touches on the public's sacrifices during the pandemic and the perceived lack of integrity within the government.

What is the main reason the resignation of Matt Hancock is not considered the end of the issue?

• The pandemic is still ongoing.

• Matt Hancock did not actually resign.

• There are still questions about government contracts and access.

• The public has not been informed about the resignation.

Why was Matt Hancock's resignation deemed necessary?

• He wanted to pursue other opportunities.

• He was asked to resign by the public.

• He broke the rules.

• He was not performing his duties well.

What criticism is directed at the Prime Minister regarding Matt Hancock's resignation?

• The Prime Minister was too quick to act.

• The Prime Minister was too slow and weak in his response.

• The Prime Minister was unaware of the situation.

• The Prime Minister showed strong leadership.

What is highlighted as a major issue within the government during the pandemic?

• A lack of public support.

• A lack of integrity and leadership.

• Too many government officials resigning.

• Excessive spending on public health.

How does the public perceive the actions of those in power compared to their own sacrifices?

• They are indifferent to the government's actions.

• They feel there is a double standard.

• They see it as fair and justified.

• They believe the government is doing its best.