CLEAN : Hong Kong backs China bid to bar rebel lawmakers

The video discusses the interpretation of oaths, emphasizing that insincere oaths are invalid. It highlights the importance of adhering to legal requirements and the government's support for these interpretations. The coexistence of judicial independence and legal interpretation within the constitutional framework is also addressed.

What is considered invalid according to the interpretation mentioned in the text?

In what manner must an oath be taken to be considered sincere and solemn?

What are the consequences of defying the prescribed taking procedure?

How does the government plan to implement the interpretation fully?

What does the basic law state regarding judicial independence and interpretation?