CLEAN : COP27: "No decision better than bad decision" (EU)

The transcript emphasizes the importance of making good decisions over bad ones, highlighting the collective effort required to achieve a positive outcome. It stresses the significance of maintaining the 1.5 Celsius climate target, deeming its failure unacceptable.

Why is it considered better to make no decision than a bad one?

• Because no decision is always the best choice.

• Because bad decisions are more expensive.

• Because making no decision saves time.

• Because bad decisions can lead to irreversible consequences.

What is necessary for a good decision to be within reach?

• All partners must work very hard.

• A single leader must make all decisions.

• Only financial resources are needed.

• Decisions should be delayed.

What does a good decision ensure in terms of climate goals?

• That climate goals are postponed.

• That the 1.5 Celsius target remains achievable.

• That the 2.0 Celsius target is abandoned.

• That new climate goals are set.

What is the stance on allowing the 1.5 Celsius target to fail?

• It is a necessary compromise.

• It is a minor setback.

• It is a future consideration.

• It is completely unacceptable.

What is the implication of failing to keep the 1.5 Celsius target alive?

• It would be a significant failure.

• It would have no impact.

• It would be a temporary problem.

• It would be a minor issue.