DIO CITES 'FIFTH' AT SENATE LABOR RACKETS PROBE

The transcript details a Senate Select Committee hearing where a witness is sworn in and questioned about his associations with certain individuals. The witness repeatedly declines to answer questions, citing the risk of self-incrimination. The session includes an oath-taking, initial questioning, and a final commentary on the situation.

What is the purpose of the swearing-in process before the Senate Select Committee?

• To verify the identity of the witness

• To introduce the committee members

• To ensure the witness is comfortable

• To guarantee the truthfulness of the testimony

Why does the witness decline to answer questions about Mr. John J. O'Rourke?

• The witness does not know Mr. O'Rourke

• The witness is not allowed to speak

• The answer might incriminate the witness

• The witness forgot the details

What is the reaction of the committee when the witness refuses to answer questions?

• They move to a different topic

• They dismiss the witness

• They insist on maintaining order

• They accept the refusal without question

What is the witness's response when asked about their acquaintance with Mr. James Hoffa?

• The witness confirms the acquaintance

• The witness denies knowing Mr. Hoffa

• The witness refuses to answer to avoid self-incrimination

• The witness provides detailed information

What rhetorical question is posed at the end of the hearing?

• Can we trust the witness's testimony?

• Do you think that's very flattering where those two gentlemen are concerned?

• Do you think this is a fair process?

• Is this the end of the session?