Greenpeace France president comments on release of activists in Russia

The transcript discusses the cautious optimism surrounding Francesco's case, highlighting the first positive development since the beginning of the issue. Despite this, there is a need for prudence as Francesco remains in detention. The uncertainty about legal proceedings, potential charges, and Francesco's freedom and travel rights are emphasized. The transcript argues that Francesco and others should not be detained or condemned as their actions were aimed at defending the climate, advocating for a clear acquittal and the end of charges against them.

What is the initial reaction to the recent development in Francesco's case?

• Immediate demand for a retrial

• Cautious optimism with a need for prudence

• Complete relief and celebration

• Indifference to the situation

What is the main concern regarding Francesco's situation in the second section?

• Whether he will be able to return to his job

• The uncertainty of his release and potential trial

• The possibility of him moving to another country

• His health condition in detention

What is the primary argument for Francesco's release in the final section?

• His actions were not criminal but aimed at climate protection

• He has served enough time in detention

• He has influential supporters advocating for him

• He has shown good behavior in detention

What is the expected outcome for Francesco and others according to the final section?

• A public apology from the authorities

• A transfer to another detention center

• A full acquittal and dismissal of charges

• A reduced sentence

What is the main reason given for why Francesco and others should not be detained?

• They have promised not to repeat their actions

• They have already been punished enough

• They have influential connections

• They were defending the climate and planet