Ministry of Commerce reacts to EU tarifs on Chinese shoes

The video discusses the EU's decision to impose anti-dumping taxes on Chinese shoe exports, which China claims is unfair and not in line with WTO rules. China argues that its exports do not harm EU industries and calls for a fair reassessment of the situation to ensure normal trade relations.

What significant event took place on March 23, 2006, concerning Chinese shoe exports?

• China imposed tariffs on EU imports.

• The EU lifted all trade restrictions on China.

• The EU approved anti-dumping duties on Chinese shoes.

• China banned EU shoe imports.

What is China's main argument against the EU's anti-dumping duties?

• China believes the duties should apply to all exports.

• China claims the duties are too low.

• China wants to increase its shoe prices.

• China argues there is no dumping or harm to the EU industry.

What does China demand from the EU regarding the anti-dumping case?

• To reduce the quality of EU shoes.

• To ban all EU shoe imports.

• To conduct a fair and comprehensive analysis.

• To increase the duties on Chinese shoes.

What is the ultimate goal of China's demands in the anti-dumping case?

• To ensure the normal development of EU-China shoe trade.

• To stop all shoe exports to the EU.

• To dominate the EU shoe market.

• To increase the price of Chinese shoes.

What does China emphasize about the decision-making process in the anti-dumping case?

• It should be based on EU regulations.

• It should be delayed indefinitely.

• It should align with WTO rules.

• It should favor EU industries.