TED: US politics isn't broken. It's fixed | Katherine M. Gehl

The video discusses the inefficiencies in the U.S. political system, comparing it to business competition. It highlights the flaws in party primaries and plurality voting, which hinder effective governance and competition. The speaker introduces 'Final Five Voting' as a solution, aiming to improve political accountability and innovation. The concept has been implemented in Alaska, showcasing its potential for broader application.

What is the main argument presented about competition in politics compared to competition in business?

How does the speaker describe the current state of Washington and its political system?

What are the two bad rules identified that hinder political competition?

Explain the concept of 'final five voting' as proposed by the speaker.

What are the expected outcomes of implementing final five voting?

Discuss the implications of plurality voting as described in the text.

What does the speaker mean by saying that politics is 'fixed'?

How does the speaker relate the dissatisfaction of the American public to the political system?

What historical context does the speaker provide regarding the founding principles of American politics?

In what ways does the speaker suggest that citizens can reclaim their political power?