Arlene Foster reacts to claims of Brexit red tape for military

The transcript discusses the impact of the protocol on Northern Ireland, particularly its effect on military movements within the UK. It highlights the need for clarity and a sustainable replacement for the current protocol, which is deemed unworkable. Concerns are raised about NATO's influence on equipment movement between Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The discussion also touches on unforeseen issues with the protocol and the need for quick solutions, including potential derogations or exemptions for military movements. The overall sentiment is that the protocol needs urgent revision to address ongoing challenges.

What are the main issues raised regarding the protocol's impact on military movements within the United Kingdom?

What does the speaker suggest is necessary for a sustainable solution to the protocol?

How does the speaker feel about NATO's involvement in military equipment movement between Great Britain and Northern Ireland?

In what ways does the speaker believe the protocol has weakened the Union?

What alternative solutions were proposed at the time the protocol was established, and why were they dismissed?