Moral Luck: Crash Course Philosophy

The video explores moral responsibility and moral luck, using a scenario of two drunk drivers, A and B, to illustrate the complexities of assigning blame. It discusses the principle 'ought implies can,' distinguishing between moral and causal responsibility, and examines how external factors and different types of luck affect moral judgments. The video also considers the difference between harm and wrongdoing, and the societal implications of assigning praise and blame.

What moral dilemma is presented in the scenario of A and B driving home from a party?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

How do philosophers like Bernard Williams and Thomas Nagel contribute to the discussion of moral responsibility?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

What does the principle 'ought implies can' mean in the context of moral responsibility?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

Discuss the distinction between causal responsibility and moral responsibility as explained in the text.

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

What is the significance of the example involving the creep taking pictures in a dressing room?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

In what ways can external factors influence the moral quality of our actions according to Nagel?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

How does the concept of moral luck challenge our understanding of praise and blame?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF