CLEAN : Expert: hush payment to Stormy Daniels violates US law

The transcript discusses allegations against the Trump campaign for violating U.S. campaign finance laws by failing to disclose a payment to Stormy Daniels. It highlights the legal requirement for candidates to disclose election-related expenditures and details how Michael Cohen's payment exceeded legal contribution limits. The discussion emphasizes the importance of transparency in election spending, as upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, and the implications of these violations on voter rights.

How did the Trump campaign allegedly violate US campaign finance laws?

What are the implications of the payment made to Stormy Daniels in relation to campaign finance laws?

Explain the role of Michael Cohen in the alleged campaign finance violations.

What is the significance of the Supreme Court's stance on voters knowing who influences their vote?

What does the text suggest about the transparency of campaign financing in the context of the 2016 election?