CLEAN : Patten calls for dialogue in divided Hong Kong

The transcript discusses the influence of political decisions on the judiciary, using the case of Joshua Wong as an example. It highlights a speech by Rimsky Yuen on Hong Kong's rule of law and stresses the importance of dialogue and understanding in political discourse.

What was the political decision made by the Secretary of Justice regarding Joshua Wong and his colleagues?

How did Rimsky Yuen describe Hong Kong in his speech at Oxford?

What does the speaker hope will happen regarding dialogue among people?

Why is it important to talk to people about values and political judgments?

What does the speaker mean by 'You can't trample ideas into the dust'?