Varadkar unsure if housing referendum can be held within current government term

The video discusses the proposal for a constitutional amendment to establish a right to housing. The speaker emphasizes the importance of precise wording to ensure the amendment facilitates the construction of new homes rather than leading to legal complications and financial diversions. The speaker warns against an amendment that could result in legal battles and compensation claims, which would not serve the public interest. The ultimate goal is to make it easier to build homes, but the speaker notes that no draft wording has been seen yet, leaving the outcome uncertain.

Why is the wording of the amendment considered crucial?

What concerns does the speaker have regarding legal fees and compensation?