VOICED : No es conveniente reabrir juicios contra guerrilleros

The transcript discusses the Colombian government's stance on examining pardons for 19 de abril guerrillas, emphasizing the importance of the state's irrevocable word in peace processes. It highlights the debate between using a plebiscite or a constituent assembly to ratify a potential peace agreement with the Farc, a proposal supported by President Juan Manuel Santos but opposed by the guerrillas. The role of Congress in examining the plebiscite project and its implications for the peace agreement is also covered.

What was the Colombian government's stance on reopening trials after a peace process?

• They left the decision to the courts.

• They supported reopening trials.

• They were against reopening trials.

• They had no opinion on the matter.

What method did President Juan Manuel Santos propose for ratifying the final agreement with the FARC?

• A national referendum

• A plebiscite

• A constituent assembly

• A parliamentary vote

What was the FARC's preferred method for ratifying the agreement?

• A plebiscite

• A constituent assembly

• A national referendum

• A parliamentary vote

What is the significance of the plebiscite according to the government?

• It is a legal requirement.

• It is a method to avoid negotiations.

• It is a gesture of good faith.

• It is a way to delay the process.

How many points are on the negotiation agenda in Havana?

• Four

• Six

• Three

• Five