Susan Hogarth is suing North Carolina over a ballot selfie the state says was illegal

Susan Hogarth, after taking a ballot selfie in North Carolina, faces legal challenges due to state laws prohibiting such actions. She argues that these laws infringe on her First Amendment rights. Her attorney, Daniel Ortner, highlights the lack of evidence supporting claims that ballot selfies lead to vote buying. The case emphasizes the importance of authenticity and expression in voting. Hogarth seeks to challenge the law, aiming for an injunction to prevent its enforcement. The discussion also touches on the broader implications for voter rights and the legality of ballot selfies across the U.S.

What law did Susan Hogarth allegedly break by taking a selfie with her ballot?

What are the potential penalties for taking a ballot selfie in North Carolina?

Why does Susan Hogarth believe that the law against ballot selfies is wrong?

What argument does Daniel Ortner make regarding the First Amendment in relation to ballot selfies?

How does Susan Hogarth differentiate between privacy and secrecy in the context of voting?

What does Susan Hogarth hope to achieve with her lawsuit against North Carolina?

What is the significance of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression in this case?