Impeachment Inquiry Is Better Off Behind Closed Doors, Rep. Cleaver Says

The transcript discusses the pros and cons of closed door hearings, emphasizing the need to protect whistleblower identities and the risks of public involvement. It highlights the difference between investigations and public hearings, noting that public exposure can hinder truth-finding. The speaker argues for closed hearings to ensure safety and integrity in the investigative process.

What are the potential risks associated with holding closed door hearings?

Why might some people argue against the idea of closed door hearings?

What concerns are raised about the safety of whistleblowers in the context of these hearings?

In what ways does the speaker believe that public hearings could hinder an investigation?

How does the speaker view the relationship between public involvement and the truth?