Trump's lawyers ask judge to set aside his conviction, citing Supreme Court's immunity ruling

The transcript discusses the Supreme Court's ruling granting partial immunity to presidents for official acts, impacting former President Trump's legal cases. Trump's legal team argues that some evidence in his New York conviction involved official acts, potentially invalidating the trial. The ruling sends the case back to the trial court to distinguish between official and unofficial acts. Reactions vary, with Trump's team seeing it as a victory, while others express concern over the implications for presidential accountability.

What are the implications of the ruling for future presidents and their conduct?

How did the White House respond to the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity?

What impact does the Supreme Court's decision have on Trump's upcoming sentencing?