Sufferers Lose Landmark Right-To-Die Battle

The transcript discusses Tony, a man with locked-in syndrome, who is unable to move or speak but can think and feel. He sought legal permission for euthanasia, which was denied by the High Court, leaving him heartbroken. The decision sparked public and ethical debates, with some doctors relieved due to the complex moral implications. Tony plans to appeal, supported by his family, as the alternative is starvation. The case highlights the challenges faced by individuals with severe disabilities and the legal and ethical dilemmas surrounding euthanasia.

What alternative does Tony's family fear he might resort to if his appeal is unsuccessful?

What is the main argument presented by Tony's family regarding his right?