CLEAN : PIP Lawyers call for trial to be postponed

The transcript discusses the preliminary inquiry process, highlighting issues with citation and the need for postponement. It calls for the annulment of the inquiry in favor of a judge, emphasizing the importance of legal compliance despite employment concerns. The presence of regulatory bodies like SfAPS and TUV is deemed crucial in legal proceedings.

What is the main concern regarding the citation for Mr. Mas?

• It was written in a foreign language.

• It was not dated, leading to confusion.

• It was not signed by the judge.

• It was delivered to the wrong person.

Why does the speaker request the annulment of the preliminary investigation?

• To start a new investigation.

• To favor an existing judge, Madame Le Goffre.

• To close the case permanently.

• To appoint a new judge.

What justification is given for the actions taken to preserve jobs?

• It was necessary to maintain salaries.

• It was a directive from the government.

• It was a legal requirement.

• It was a temporary solution.

What is the speaker's opinion on maintaining salaries while violating laws?

• It is acceptable if it benefits employees.

• It is a minor issue compared to other concerns.

• It is a common practice in business.

• It is not justified under any circumstances.

What is the speaker's criticism regarding the role of SfAPS and TUV?

• They should have provided financial support.

• They should have been present in the proceedings.

• They should have been the main investigators.

• They should have remained neutral.