Family Obligations: Crash Course Philosophy

The video explores the philosophical perspectives on the obligations children have towards their parents. Jane English argues that grown children owe nothing to their parents, proposing a friendship model instead. Hugh LaFollette suggests licensing parents to ensure competence. Claudia Mills emphasizes the unique, unchosen nature of family relationships, advocating for the ethics of care. The video concludes by discussing the potential issues with relying solely on the ethics of care.

What are the potential implications of requiring parents to obtain a license before having children, as suggested by Hugh LaFollette?

How does Claudia Mills' perspective on family obligations differ from traditional views?

What are the main characteristics of the ethics of care as discussed in the text?