CLEAN : Separatists in Donetsk slam Poroshenkos populist speech

The transcript discusses a speech filled with populist rhetoric and unfeasible promises, particularly regarding elections in Donetsk. It highlights the assassination of a humanitarian aide, suggesting it was a professional hit rather than a random act. The speaker speculates on the perpetrators, hinting at political motives and ongoing conflicts.

What was the main criticism of the recent speech according to the speaker?

• It was delivered in the wrong language.

• It was overly technical.

• It was full of populism and vague promises.

• It was too short.

What issue did the speaker highlight about elections in Donetsk?

• They were postponed indefinitely.

• They failed to conduct any elections, even for the president.

• They were held in secret.

• They were conducted smoothly.

What does the speaker suggest about the nature of the assistant's murder?

• It was an accident.

• It was a case of mistaken identity.

• It was a random act of violence.

• It was a professional hit.

What does the speaker imply about the perpetrators of the murder?

• They are likely amateurs.

• They are from a rival political party.

• Their identity is obvious.

• They are unknown.

How does the speaker describe their current adversaries?

• As peacekeepers.

• As neutral parties.

• As terrorists and bandits.

• As allies.