CLEAN : Trial begins in Frances multiple euthanasia case

The transcript discusses a doctor's need to justify his actions, which he believes were always in line with his medical duties. It critiques the decision of the Council of the Order, which judged without a complete dossier, calling it inhumane. The conversation also touches on the ineffectiveness of morphine in alleviating suffering and supports the doctor's actions, expressing concern over potential punishment.

Why does the speaker believe the doctor should not feel ashamed?

• Because he is a friend of the speaker.

• Because he is well-known.

• Because he has never made a mistake.

• Because he has always acted as a professional.

What is the speaker's opinion on the medical council's decision?

• It was well-reasoned.

• It was based on solid evidence.

• It was fair and justified.

• It was inhumane and unjust.

What does the speaker find problematic about the council's judgment process?

• They were too lenient.

• They took too long to decide.

• They consulted too many experts.

• They judged without a complete file.

Why was morphine ineffective for the patient?

• The patient was too young.

• The patient was allergic to it.

• The patient had been using it for years.

• The patient refused to take it.

What is the speaker's stance on the potential punishment for the doctor?

• The speaker is indifferent.

• The speaker thinks it is inevitable.

• The speaker believes it is necessary.

• The speaker would be very upset.