Another Insitution Is Taking 'Oriental' Out Of Its Name

The video discusses the reconsideration of the term 'Oriental' by institutions like the Oriental Institute at the University of Chicago. The term is seen as offensive due to its colonial roots and dehumanizing connotations. Historical context is provided, including Edward Saeed's work on Orientalism. Legislative changes, such as President Obama's 2016 law, reflect a shift towards more inclusive language. Despite these changes, debates continue, with some viewing the term as part of cultural heritage. The video concludes with ongoing changes at the Oriental Institute.

What are the reasons behind the reconsideration of the term 'Oriental' by institutions like the Oriental Institute at the University of Chicago?

How has the definition and usage of the word 'Oriental' evolved over time, particularly in relation to colonialism?

What impact did President Obama's law in 2016 have on the use of the term 'Oriental' in federal language?

Discuss the perspectives of individuals who do not find the term 'Oriental' offensive. What reasons do they provide?

What are the implications of the term 'Oriental' in contemporary discussions about race and identity?