CLEAN : French ex leader Nicolas Sarkozy charged with corruption

The transcript discusses a legal case involving contested evidence based on recordings between a client and their lawyer, and even between a lawyer and their bar president. The legality of these recordings is questioned, and the defense plans to challenge their use. The situation is described as unprecedented in France and possibly worldwide. Despite the accusations, the defense believes there is little substantial evidence and is determined to fight the charges. Thierry Herzog, the lawyer involved, is back at work and continues his practice.

What is the speaker's initial reaction to the situation?

• They are excited about the case.

• They are pleased with the developments.

• They express dissatisfaction and concern.

• They are indifferent to the situation.

What is the main reason the speaker contests the charges?

• The charges are based on unreliable witnesses.

• The charges are based on outdated laws.

• The charges are based on contested wiretaps.

• The charges are based on public opinion.

What is unusual about the wiretaps mentioned by the speaker?

• They involve conversations between a lawyer and a judge.

• They involve conversations between a lawyer and their client.

• They involve conversations between a lawyer and their bar president.

• They involve conversations between a lawyer and a journalist.

What does the speaker believe about the evidence in the case?

• The evidence is overwhelming and undeniable.

• The evidence is irrelevant to the case.

• There is little to no material evidence supporting the accusations.

• There is substantial evidence supporting the accusations.

What is Thierry Herzog's next step according to the speaker?

• He will continue his work as a lawyer.

• He will retire from his legal practice.

• He will change his career path.

• He will take a break from legal work.